Project Details
Projekt Print View

Dynamic Membrane association of the bacterial SRP receptor in E. coli

Subject Area Metabolism, Biochemistry and Genetics of Microorganisms
Term from 2008 to 2015
Project identifier Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Project number 43311986
 
Final Report Year 2016

Final Report Abstract

The recognition and transport of proteins destined to reside in different cellular compartments is an inherent and essential process in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Although a large number of different protein transport pathways have been identified in different species, only a few pathways appear to be universally conserved. An example is the Signal recognition particle (SRP) dependent protein targeting pathway, which consists of SRP and the SRP-receptor (SR). SR in eukaryotes consists of two subunits; SRα binds SRP, while SRβ is an integral membrane protein that tethers SRα to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The bacterial SR consists only of the SRα homologue FtsY, but still significant amounts of FtsY were found associated with the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane, although a membrane-integral SRβ subunit is missing and FtsY itself does not contains a transmembrane domain. We have characterized the membrane binding of FtsY by multiple in vivo and in vitro approaches and found that FtsY binds to the membrane via two short lipid-binding helices with a preference for negatively charged lipids. In addition, FtsY binds to the SecY subunit of the universally conserved SecYEG translocon. Here, FtsY occupies the ribosome-binding site of the SecYEG translocon, which suggested a possible mechanism for hand-over of nascent membrane proteins from the targeting machinery to the insertion machinery. This was addressed by in site-directed cross-linking and in vitro FRET analyses, which revealed that SRP delivers RNCs to the SecY-bound FtsY, resulting in a quaternary complex, in which FtsY was displaced from the ribosome-binding SecY loop, which in turn was then occupied by the ribosomal protein uL23. Thus, the interaction between SRP and SR induces a reciprocal conformational change that exposes the ribosome-binding site on the SecYEG translocon and simultaneously the SecY binding site on the ribosome. This explains how a nascent membrane protein is handed over from the targeting machinery to the SecY translocon. SRP not delivers substrate to SecYEG, but also to the YidC insertase. YidC inserts not only small membrane proteins, as previously suggested, but also multispanning membrane proteins that were previously thought to be exclusively SecYEG dependent. Targeting of multi-spanning membrane proteins to YidC is also SRP-dependent, but appears to be not strictly FtsY-dependent. This suggests that SRP-dependent targeting to YidC does not exactly follow the pathway revealed for targeting to SecYEG.

Publications

 
 

Additional Information

Textvergrößerung und Kontrastanpassung